As is posted on the agenda for the upcoming Harrisonburg City Council meeting on Tuesday (7pm 409 South Main St), the council will consider the sale of the former Harrisonburg Police Department property to Rosetta Stone. The consideration of this sale has sparked a lot of healthy and constructive conversation about the direction of downtown Harrisonburg, including an online dialogue at HBurgNews.com, which raises a number of relevant questions in a rather constructive manner.
For this decision, there will be a public hearing. That means when we reach that agenda item, we will open the floor for the public. People are invited to come in front of the city council and comment for or against the proposed sale.
Public hearings are an important part of our local decision-making process, and very often few people show up to participate. I hear from many people that they would like to see more participation in the decisions facing the direction of the city, and sharing opinions at a public hearing is great opportunity to do just that. I invite you to come and share your opinion about what to consider in this sale.
I believe this is a valuable opportunity for the city for a number of reasons. I support incentivizing and supporting a locally-grown business when its track record suggests its ability to successfully fulfill a pledge of 100 new jobs. Having jobs of this type in the heart of downtown is a tremendous asset towards continuing the downtown revitalization, and should be a boon to downtown living and working. Putting available property back into the private sector is preferable to me, in general, especially with a commitment to add $500,000 in improvements. The combined increased property taxes and spending will make up for the lower sales price in the short term. Long-term considerations about the future growth and expansion of services, like the jail, should be considered, as many have pointed out. It is my judgment at this time that this project aligns with the economic and smart growth goals for the city, is properly located according to the Comprehensive Plan, and does not unduly compromise future needs of providing government services.
Whether you agree or not with my assessment, I again encourage your input. If you agree, remember every decision needs at least three votes, so you can share your agreement with me and the other council members. If you don’t agree, I’ve shared with you some of my thinking above and hope it helps provide you a little insight to what I’m valuing at the moment and what an effective counter-argument would need to address.
If attending Tuesday’s public hearing is not a possibility, individual council members can be emailed using the “Contact” links on each of our bio pages.